animals vs. children.
Mar. 27th, 2008 11:49 amquestion of the day.
some people claim to love their animals as much as they love their children. some people find this idea offensive - how can an animal mean as much as a child or be as worthy of love? on the other hand, when has human love had anything to do with worth?
what do you think?
some people claim to love their animals as much as they love their children. some people find this idea offensive - how can an animal mean as much as a child or be as worthy of love? on the other hand, when has human love had anything to do with worth?
what do you think?
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-27 09:32 pm (UTC)I think it's silly to get offended by what people say they love unless it actively intrudes on your life in some way. I think what people find offensive is the idea that the life of a pet is as valuable as the life of a child. I can see why people find it offensive, and also why people get offended that someone finds it offensive. Whee!
Personally, if I only had time to rescue one creature from a burning building, and there was a choice between a child and a pet, I'd choose the child. I'd choose the child even if it weren't my child and it WAS my pet. I would absolutely consider someone saving a pet, their own or someone else's, over a child, any child, to have made the wrong call.
Pets are great. I love my cats. My cats have affection for me, of some kind. All that said, I think it's arrogant in the extreme to compare the pet relationship to human relationships. The complexities of human relationships are off the charts and far away from those that exist in a human/animal bond, because there can be no true equality between pet and human.
~a