Mar. 22nd, 2007

2eclipse: (rachel - sleep)
just got off the phone with my adviser. she has finished reading the paper and was immensely supportive. she thinks this will be a strong paper
she also thinks i need to rewrite my introduction (in the form of adding to it) and state from the beginning my theological foundation in the imago dei. she says i've done a good job with the "what" and "how", now i need to work on my "why".
i also need to narrow my focus at the end of the paper. i have said what specific actions need to be changed and how, but i haven't said what the theological implications of those actions are.
the good news is that the bulk of the paper is in good shape - i just need to fix the beginning and the end.

she is a sharp lady. the second of those two things will be easy to fix. the first one....writing introductions is always difficult for me. creatio ex nihilo n' all that. in this case though, i'm not starting from nothing. that should make it somewhat easier.

[livejournal.com profile] sunmother sent me some great revisions along with a section of questions that bothers me because i ask them too - but which i think belong in a separate paper. i have started incorporating her suggestions into the paper and most of them are vast improvements. i hope to get my friend corrin's editing back this week and send something close to final to dr. mitchell this weekend.

Profile

2eclipse: (Default)
2eclipse

August 2009

S M T W T F S
      1
234 5678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags