2eclipse: (eclipse)
[personal profile] 2eclipse
yesterday I listened to speaking of faith on NPR. Krista was interviewing Barbara Kingslover (author of the poisonwood bible) about the ethics of eating. Barbara and her family moved to southern Virginia (god help her) and made a project of eating for a year only those things they could grow/raise themselves. It seems the family has written a book about the experience, called animal, vegetable, miracle.
In the interview, kingslover talked about how we in this country have forgotten to ask questions about where our food comes from and what it takes to get it to us. She brings up hurricane Katrina and addresses the fact that it isn’t simply the government’s responsibility to provide infrastructure….but that the tragedy was also a result of the vulnerability caused when an area cannot support itself on what it grows. She asks the question “how long can we live like this and expect to not pay a price” in light of how much of the world’s resources we are using. Some people give up meat in order to eat more sustainably. She gave up bananas, citing the use of fossil fuels to provide them(for transport and refrigeration). She did some thinking about it and decided it wasn’t cruelty free in light of the resources being used.
I find myself convicted by the points she brought up. I love sushi! How much of my food comes from china or japan? How much of my food comes from California instead of being grown locally? It used to be that almost all the food a community consumed was grown locally and organically. Now it has become a “special” thing to eat that way. We import exotics from overseas while the farmers around us are struggling! How many fossil fuels are burn to bring me the food I eat? I am very interested in reading this book….and in talking with ross about what we can do to change our eating habits. I agree with her that we have a responsibility to think about the overall economic and ecological impact of our habits, not only locally, but globally.
I am also torn up about it…..because some people have allergies and some people have such strong dislikes of certain foods that they need more specialized foods. If everyone started being more conscious about what they ate to the point where there was no market for imported foods, the prices on those items would go up proportionally. Is it really such a smart thing to shift the market in this way?

(no subject)

Date: 2007-07-23 01:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rumpleteazaer.livejournal.com
I am very interested in reading this book too. Living in Ohio means I am rather fortunate in the abundance of locally produced food. I am alos fortunate that my allergy to shellfish means most seafood is at least not apitizing to me or at worst lethal.

It will sadden me to give up the bananas and pineapple though :(

(no subject)

Date: 2007-07-23 02:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] frog-lady.livejournal.com
Unless someone has really serious allergies (like a friend of mine who's allergic to all nightshades), it shouldn't be too hard to find at least most of their unprocessed food locally. If people in Maine can do so, I'd guess that it's possible in most of the US. That said, eating only local food takes more time and energy, especially to store produce for winter, and not everyone can do so. This post goes into some of the associated issues...but I think the major thing for people to consider right now is that eating some locally grown and/or processed food is better than eating none.

Oh, and re. local foods and allergies/special foods--if one makes one's food from basic ingredients instead of eating processed foods, it's a lot easier to avoid the things to which one is allergic, especially if those things are common additives.

Sorry my comment got so long. :)

(By the way, I'm enting on Ravelry. I saw you were also on lj and friends with [livejournal.com profile] crowyhead, and friended you here as well.)

(no subject)

Date: 2007-07-23 03:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] 2eclipse.livejournal.com
don't worry about the length. many of my comments are longer.:)
i friended you on ravelry because i liked your projects, but i am also amused by your username, enting. is this a tolkien reference?

not everyone has storage space for local foods that's true. kingslover mentioned harvesting 200 onions and braiding them for the winter. i only wish i knew how to do that. it seems like anything i keep out of the refrigerator(even garlic) goes bad. but i am a big fan of doing my own berry-picking and such. i just need to learn how to preserve more things. homemade jam is better than storebought, but it is too expensive if you buy from the grocery store instead of going berry-picking. one of my friends is going to teach me to pickle at the end of the summer.

the allergy thing is more difficult with things like wheat allergies. i suppose you could find a local baker and go that route, but bread from other grains is difficult to find at most grocery stores and local wheat isn't often found at your farmer's market....also i don't know anyone who has time to make ALL their own bread.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-07-23 03:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] frog-lady.livejournal.com
Well...wheat-free is only really difficult if you insist on eating bread. If you go the corn tortilla/cornbread/etc. route, instead, you just don't put wheat in things. It's true that flours and grains of various sorts are the things I have the hardest time finding local sources for, and my wheat-allergic advisor would have real trouble finding local rice. That's the kind of thing I think it's fairer to get from far away, since it doesn't require refrigeration.

(I would also really, really not recommend ever making bread with all rye flour. I tried it once, because we were running low on wheat flour...bad idea.)

And yes, my ravelry/flickr username is a Tolkien reference. My initials are ENT, which my parents thought would be cute since my dad's a forest ecologist...and I'm certainly not old in tree terms.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-07-23 03:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zankoku-zen.livejournal.com
This isn't about just eating locally.

It's also about the people who can afford to pay for either organic or locally grown food.

Think about that.

The quality of food available to you greatly depends on the kind of money you make. Fresh fruit and vegetables can be greatly prohibitive financially for those in the lower eschelons of the pay earning scale.

It's the Whole Foods vs Walmart debate.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-07-23 03:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] 2eclipse.livejournal.com
organic food does tend to be more expensive.
however i find that locally grown stuff is actually LESS expensive, provided you know where to go. whole foods is a no-no for cheap anything. but my local supermarkets(in 3 different states) have all carried seasonal local produce for reasonable prices. farmers markets are good for this too if you can find them. there is a program in minneapolis where farmers come and set up stands in poor neighborhoods, selling for less than grocery stores, but still making a profit because there is no middleman. you can also get (for very little money) membership to farm co-ops in minnesota and the dc area. 150 bucks or so will get you fresh vegetables weekly - whatever is ripe for harvest. you don't get to choose, but it is inexpensive in the long run.

It isn't very simple is it?

Date: 2007-07-23 04:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zankoku-zen.livejournal.com
True. But again, the seasonal may present a problem. Esp. during winter.

How accessible are these programs to people that must rely on public transportation?

But how reasonable is reasonable? Is there an assurance that my local farmers aren't hiring illegal immigrants to keep their prices low and that these workers are making a fair wage for their work as well?

(no subject)

Date: 2007-07-23 04:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] knitthenight.livejournal.com
Wow, I'd love to read that book, too. That's something I dream of doing someday.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-07-23 04:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] knitthenight.livejournal.com
Why would a nightshade allergy prevent one from finding sufficient unprocessed local food? I strongly dislike nightshades and they're pretty easy to avoid.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-07-23 05:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] 2eclipse.livejournal.com
aren't tomatoes related to nightshade?

Re: It isn't very simple is it?

Date: 2007-07-23 05:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] 2eclipse.livejournal.com
the seasonal may not provide what we _want_ all the time, but it is how humans have been eating for centuries.
very accessible. the farmers set up stands right in the poor neighborhoods - or sell out of the back of their truck.

i personally don't care if people are hiring illegal immigrants as long as they pay them fairly....which is always the catch.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-07-23 05:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] keisolo.livejournal.com
Sounds like something I might want to read.

It's also something I'd like to do... but this goes back to one of my gripes regarding green-ness - at this point it's harder to do if you have really tight budget strictures. Which is why so many people shop at Walmart, which is something we do manage to avoid.

You should look into Robert Redford's "The Green." He does a bunch of things with it on Sundance channel, but they also have a website.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-07-23 05:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] 2eclipse.livejournal.com
i've had dreams of self-sufficiency ever since i saw (and susequently read) my side of the mountain when i was a kid.
i hate malwart. HATE.
i will look into it.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-07-23 05:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] frog-lady.livejournal.com
I was mostly thinking of how much of the super-abundant summer produce is nightshade. It'd probably only really be a problem for someone allergic to both nightshades and wheat, and that'd be an issue whether eating local food or not. Eh, maybe it just wasn't a good example.

Re: It isn't very simple is it?

Date: 2007-07-23 05:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mirage897.livejournal.com
I think population density comes into play as well.

When we all used to eat organic locally grown food the population of the cities and suburbs was so much lower.

Nowadays to sustain such an agricultural system people would have to spread out all into the countryside. And then you have huge issues of pollution and energy consumption for commutes.

Just a few thoughts.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-07-23 05:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] keisolo.livejournal.com
Your icon for this sent me into a fit of laughter.
Thank you.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-07-23 05:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] frog-lady.livejournal.com
You may want to check out eatlocalchallenge.com for various people's takes on eating locally. They also had a one-week challenge in late April wherein participants (myself included) ate as locally as possible while tracking expenses. It wasn't *cheap*, but the general consensus was that eating locally and within the average American's weekly food budget is doable. The real problem is that people working minimum wage jobs may not have the extra time it takes to eat cheap, healthy food, whether local or not.

Re: It isn't very simple is it?

Date: 2007-07-23 05:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] frog-lady.livejournal.com
On the other hand, if we had cities surrounded by farms instead of suburbs, there'd probably be more local, organic food available to the citydwellers.

what we want vs. what we need

Date: 2007-07-23 05:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zankoku-zen.livejournal.com
so despite all of our progress, I have to eat like my ancestors and forego whatever nutritional advantages I have now? In that case, I'd eat whatever is "in season" and have to multivitamin myself all the time. And I really do hate to take pills all the time because in theory I should be able to get all my nutrients from my food.

I'm also pretty sure I'm not going to give up quinoa any time soon. I like quinoa. To quote wikipedia: "In contemporary times this crop has come to be highly appreciated for its nutritional value, as its protein content (12%–18%) is very high. Unlike wheat or rice (which are low in lysine), quinoa contains a balanced set of essential amino acids for humans, making it an unusually complete foodstuff. This means it takes less quinoa protein to meet one's needs than wheat protein. It is a good source of dietary fiber and phosphorus and is high in magnesium and iron. Quinoa is gluten free and considered easy to digest. Because of all these characteristics, quinoa is being considered as a possible crop in NASA's Controlled Ecological Life Support System for long-duration manned spaceflights." Quinoa isn't grown locally.

I agree in sustainability and I like the idea of being able to eat and support local farmers.

But I do agree with mirage897 that we need to think about what it would take to sustain such an agricultural system esp. for the people that live in urban areas.

I'd like to point out that all of this could be more possible in a tropical climate, since it's possible to grow fruits and vegetables year round.

Re: It isn't very simple is it?

Date: 2007-07-23 05:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] 2eclipse.livejournal.com
or we could just do what the germans do!
one of the few good things hitler established were small gardens set aside for city people to go work on. he believed that working with the land was "good for the geist" and wanted it to be available to everyone. with a half-acre or so of land you can produce a LOT of food.

That's one of my gripes

Date: 2007-07-23 05:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zankoku-zen.livejournal.com
The real problem is that people working minimum wage jobs may not have the extra time it takes to eat cheap, healthy food, whether local or not.

This is only possible if you're in the economic position to pay for your ideals.

Which really is a sad state of affairs.

I can't remember, but I think there was an old Slate article (a couple years ago) that when it comes to food equality and democratization, Walmart did more for MORE people than Whole Foods did.

Re: what we want vs. what we need

Date: 2007-07-23 05:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] 2eclipse.livejournal.com
i agree with mirage 897 too! my point is that we need to be asking questions about what we are asking for when we import food. the current standard is that whoever can afford it, can get it and does get it without ever thinking about whether or not burning the fossil fuels or paying people in low wages is worth it and without asking whether or not these things are happening to get them what they want - in many cases the answer is that the food has been grown, harvested and transported fairly and ecologically because sometimes we eat locally without even knowing it.

there are a lot of foods i would have trouble giving up - like seafood, for example. i'm not sure that i'm willing to do it. but the point is that i need to be THINKING about my choices when i make them.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-07-23 05:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] 2eclipse.livejournal.com
that's great i'll look into it.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-07-23 05:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] 2eclipse.livejournal.com
anytime lady. that icon did the same for me when i saw it....as did the one my friend [livejournal.com profile] sidhedevil uses "lj....because you can't masturbate ALL the time." teehee.
feel free to snag it, just credit the person who made it.

Re: what we want vs. what we need

Date: 2007-07-23 05:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zankoku-zen.livejournal.com
but the point is that i need to be THINKING about my choices when i make them.

so you can martyrize yourself over them or beat yourself up about it later? we all try to do the conscientious choice, but if we deliberately choose something that isn't as good as it should be, what do we do then? is it a better decision because you knew? and even when knowing, you still chose to do so?

and this is extreme and i don't believe in it, but i will argue: "what's the point of thinking about it if you're still going to choose the same option as if you hadn't thought about it?"

i mean, in the scenario where you think about A and B, and you know that A uses pesticides that are harmful for the environment but grown locally and B is organic but comes from 3000 miles away, what do you do then? do you support the local farmer? do you help the environment?

(no subject)

Date: 2007-07-23 06:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] knitthenight.livejournal.com
Yeah, tomatoes and peppers are the only actual foods that I know of. I can't stand either.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-07-23 06:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] knitthenight.livejournal.com
Yeah, that is what I was thinking. My family's garden may be producing tons of tomatoes and some peppers, but I just ignore them in favor of the fresh homegrown broccoli! Yum!

(no subject)

Date: 2007-07-23 06:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] frog-lady.livejournal.com
Well, it's also the eggplant and potatoes...but, yeah, broccoli!

Re: what we want vs. what we need

Date: 2007-07-23 07:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] 2eclipse.livejournal.com
is it a better decision because you knew? and even when knowing, you still chose to do so?

actually this is exactly what i think because knowing that i am making a choice that has effects from others i will a) choose those things less often and b)take responsibility for when i do choose the less economically/ecologically sound choices.

some foods are less important to eat organic...damned if i remember what they are, but i think onions are some of them. they just aren't all that effected by pesticides, or we peel them anyway and they don't absorb very much, or stuff like that. other things are especially effected by organic production and we really reap the benefits when we choose organic. you have to do your homework on this stuff to make sensible choices.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-07-23 09:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] knitthenight.livejournal.com
Potatoes are nightshades? Really? ::ponders:: I guess I don't unequivocally hate nightshades after all... just nightshade fruit ;)

(no subject)

Date: 2007-07-23 09:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] 2eclipse.livejournal.com
tomatoes might be debateable, but i'm pretty sure peppers are solidly in the vegetable category.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-07-23 09:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] knitthenight.livejournal.com
No, tomatoes, peppers, and eggplants are all fruit (though tomatoes are legally vegetables, for importation purposes I believe). They are seeds with yummy stuff around them.
From: [identity profile] 2eclipse.livejournal.com
Botanically speaking, the tomato you eat is a fruit. So is a watermelon, green pepper, eggplant, cucumber, and squash. A "fruit" is any fleshy material covering a seed or seeds.

Horticulturally speaking, the tomato is a vegetable plant. The plant is an annual and nonwoody. Most fruits, from a horticulture perspective, are grown on a woody plant (apples, cherries, raspberries, oranges) with the exception of strawberries.
From: [identity profile] knitthenight.livejournal.com
Well, I'm talking about the part people eat, so yeah... fruit. If you only used the horticultural definition, then no one would regularly get their daily 2-3 servings of fruit :-P

don't forget water too....

Date: 2007-07-23 10:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] llm145.livejournal.com
I read this great book for grad school a few years ago, "Cadillac Desert," about our policy on water in the west. It really brought home the utter ridiculousness of our agriculture policy in the country - although there have been some good unforeseen side effects of the policy too (like the influx of power right when we needed it during WWII). To quickly summarize the book's argument, the government built for gigantic dams the create reservoirs. Then farmers receive subsidized prices for water from those reservoirs. Because water has become so artificially inexpensive, farmers began grow water-dependent crops in arid areas where those crops should never be grown - even as farmers in other areas back East are paid to destroy those same crops. The real cost of a loaf of bread (after the subsidies for all the water, the charges for the taxpayer-funded dam construction, and the subsidies to destroy unneeded crops are added back in) is bizarrely high. Not even to mention the environmental damage of all of those dams - or the realities of pork-barrel politics - or the explosion of population in areas that can't naturally sustain it because of government-subsidized water. Anyway, it's a really interesting book, believe it or not, and he makes a compelling argument. If you read it you will never be able to look at food or water in the same way. :)

(no subject)

Date: 2007-07-24 03:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] spiralshell.livejournal.com
I am looking forward to reading this book -- sounds really interesting.
And I think that like so many things it's about making small steps.
Just like if every American got a car that got just 3 to 5 miles more per gallon, we would reduce our fuel consumption by a huge amount, if everybody bought apples every other shopping trip instead of bananas, we would shift our fruit consumption from very long distance to pretty local. Everybody does not need to get 40 mpg for us to significantly reduce our dependence on gas, and everybody does not need to eat all local all the time in order to reduce our dependence on long-distance food. Yes, it would be great to get there eventually, but we have to crawl first. :)
None of this has to be all or nothing -- it's much more about getting a lot of people to make small changes than about getting a very small number of people to make the enormous change of eating only local foods.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-07-24 01:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] 2eclipse.livejournal.com
you obviously get exactly what i'm talking about.

Re: don't forget water too....

Date: 2007-07-24 01:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] 2eclipse.livejournal.com
i know that water is a BIG issue, but i don't think i want to read this book. i think i would find it too depressing. eating locally is something i can DO something about...but beyond not wasting water myself...i just don't feel like there is very much i can do about the situation in the west.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-07-24 01:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lucifermourning.livejournal.com
this makes so much sense. my fiance and i have just signed up with one of the local organic food delivery companies (suprise assortment of fruit and veg every 2 weeks!), not just for these reasons but also for health reasons - more variety in our diets, more fruit and veg uptake. it doesn't mean i'll give up bananas (which i love), but i won't eat as many now i've got some nectarines in the fridge.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-08-01 01:28 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] keisolo.livejournal.com
Nah. Wouldn't snag it, might have to create something similar, though.

Update: Made one of my roomates near choke, and my partner giggled. Then I showed it to my gaming mates, and there was much chaos.

Profile

2eclipse: (Default)
2eclipse

August 2009

S M T W T F S
      1
234 5678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags