so, im probably way off here, but why not include augustine? even if you use him for debunking or arguing against his style which comparatively to yours makes his arguments less valid?
im horribly underread on augustine and your work or theory, but in the end, even if you despise a source, doesnt mean you can exclude it. it can work against you very fast when its defending time, unless you put in there somehow why its excluded or little used.
just some randomness, that may or may not help you in the end.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-11 05:17 pm (UTC)im horribly underread on augustine and your work or theory, but in the end, even if you despise a source, doesnt mean you can exclude it. it can work against you very fast when its defending time, unless you put in there somehow why its excluded or little used.
just some randomness, that may or may not help you in the end.